Showing posts with label Nairs. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nairs. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 27, 2014

NAIR HISTORIAN VS NAMPOOTHIRI BRAHMINS - THE CANKER OF DRAVIDIAN SEPARATISM !!!


Prof. Elamkulam
Kaanippayoor Sankaran Nampoothiri
Nair Historian Prof. Elamkulam Kunjan Pillai, upbraided the Nampoothiri’s of Kerala, to the extent  that a prominent Nampoothiri amongst them, Panditha-rajan Kaanippayyoor Sankaran Nampoothirippad, offered defense, and then went on the offensive against the Nairs.


Prof. Elamkulam Kunjan Pillai claimed that Nairs  belonged to the Dravidian Race. That means he subscribed to Aryan-Dravidian Racist theories.  The Prof.’s claim were rebutted by Kaanippayoor, and he asserted that Nairs were the descendents of Nagas ,citing the
opinion of  Chattambi Swami, considered to be the spiritual guru of Nairs  & other historians like K.P Padmanabha Menon and R. Narayana Panicker.  And Kanipayyor further pointed out  to the Prof.’s own work which informs that Nagas originally  lived in N.India, mainly at Gorakhpur, Nagpur, Allahabad, Nalanda,  Sind, and the hills of Assam.

Kaanippayoor's Work, The pre-history of Nairs
So how did the Nagas reach Kerala & became Nairs ??. Kanipayoor explains that,  the ancestors of Nampoothiri’s who originally belonged to Sind, had brought the Nagas , also belonging to Sind, along with them as soldiers & servants.

Thus  Kaanippayyor turned the tables on the Nair Historian, Prof. Elamkulam Kunjan Pillai, using the same Aryan-Dravidian Racist theory,  to which the Prof. also subscribed. Thus together both of them succumbed to the RACIST Aryan- Dravidian separatist theory. Kanipayoor could thus project that Nairs also had come from outside Dravida-naadu, along within the colonizing Brahmins from Sind. Thus both were OUTSIDERS, not originally belonging to S.India.  These exchanges demonstrates the extent to which Aryan-Dravidian Racist theory had a hold on the imagination of the literati belonging to that period, and also the extent to which it was internalized by them. There is also the likelihood, that Chattambi Swamigal would also have been influenced by the linguistic theories in vogue at that time in the ‘learned’ circles in S.India.

Now consider the background of  Prof. Elamkulam Kunjan Pillai. (b.1904 – d.1973) Quote “From language and literature his interests
turned first to the history of languages and culture and then to social- history.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elamkulam_Kunjan_Pillai
This was similar to the interests and career of that 'linguistic scholar" Bishop Robert Caldwell, before him.
 And another interesting coincidence was, he was the contemporary
Bishop Caldwell
EVR



of Periyar E.V.Ramasamy (b.1879- d.1973), who started the Self-Respect Movement or the Dravidian Movement and proposed the creation of an independent state called Dravida Nadu, comprising the states of South India. He also endorsed violence against Brahmins. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periyar_E._V._Ramasamy

Thus the deadly virus of Dravidian Separatism spread all over S.india, and had infected the mind of a Kerala Historian, prompting him to unleash tirades against the  Brahmin Nampoothiris, just like how it was happening to Brahmins in Tamil Nadu under the able guidance of  EVR.


The seed of Dravidian Separatism and Linguistic chauvinisms were
genetically(artificially) engineered in the scheming minds of two Protestant Christians from Britain- Bishop Robert Caldwell , who was the Bishop of Tinnevelly, and Francis Whyte Ellis. An interesting account of this can be had at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_aXkwP2Shg.

Did we not err ? Did we not disparage , disrespect, and disregard our Traditional Nobility ? Are we not continuing with the mistake, by casting aspersions on the Travancore Royal Family.? WE deliberately disregarded,  in our ignorance we forgot that, nobility is not just about power and wealth/money. It is PRIMARILY about VALUES !!!!!

And what about the MODERN  nobility and rulers who replaced Traditional Nobility. !!? Aren’t we paying a huge price, due to collapse of our VALUE SYSTEM !!!!.

In Kerala, who benefitted from such foolishness and ignorance. Politically the Marxists &  Christians !!!

More details can be had at the following links 




Tuesday, May 13, 2014

CHANNAR LAHALA - A CANARD SPREAD INTERNATIONALLY BY PROTESTANT CHRISTIAN MISSIONARIES

The Canard
"The Channar Lahala (ചാന്നാർ ലഹള) or Channar revolt refers to incidents surrounding the rebellion by Nadar climber women asserting their right to wear upper-body clothes against the caste restrictions sanctioned by the Travancore kingdom, a part of present day Kerala, India."     ref  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Channar_revolt).

This is how the Channar Lahala or "Breast-Cloth Controversy" as named by Protestant Church Circles, and repeated in History textbooks and Reformist & Progressive literature, is presented to the world. The new generation of Hindus are the worst affected, psychologically, by such malicious propaganda, as they are induced to view their past in most unfavorable light. They are made to hang their heads in shame, when someone refers to such uncouth behaviour of their fathers and grandfathers, who were the natural leaders of this land (Kerala). This further generates disrespect towards ones ancestry, which inturn creates a mental block from accepting and imbibing, wisdom, knowledge, and VALUES from ones's ancestors. The abandonment and disrespect shown towards the ancestral religion, was a direct consequence of this situation. This situation  made the job easy for the Missionaries in exerting their hegemony on all areas of public life in Travancore. Later, the process set in motion by the  Missionaries, were taken over by the Left parties, and it led to the growth and consolidation of the Left parties in Kerala. But were our ancestors morally lacking and considered lascivious behaviour & sexual exploitation as their favorite pastime !!!??? Let us find out.

The Real Facts
India became a great crime scene, of various crimes committed by
CHOGANS
the Protestant British. The partners in crime, under various categories, were the East India Company employees, MISSIONARIES, and later the Imperial Government. They were assisted in many crimes by Indian compradors.  But any criminal will leave certain clues, which will finally implicate the criminal and prove him guilty. Let us examine one such clue, left by a British Protestant Missionary, The Rev. (?) Samuel Mateer , Of the London Missionary Society. The following passages are quotes from his books, The Land of Charity & Native Life in Travancore.

The Channar Revolt is NOT about FORCED  NUDITY of the upper-part of the female body. It was about the ‘Randam-Mundu”, worn by the elders and people of status/position/respectability in the society. When a person of lower rank happens to be in the presence of that of a man of higher rank, he has to show respect by removing his  “randam-mundu”, as a mark of respect to the higher rank/position.

CHRISTIAN FEMALE, WITH JACKET & UPPER CLOTH
All these years, the Public in Kerala and the world, have been misled into believing that Nair men had prevented Shanar/Nadar women from covering the upper part of their body, and these women were forced to move about baring their uncovered breasts. This canard was spread Internationally  by the British Protestant Christian Missionaries, by naming it “BREAST-CLOTH CONTROVERSY”. Those who benefitted from this vicious propaganda were, the Church and its Missionaries, Marxists, Ambedkarites, Modern Reformers, Dalit Organisations in Kerala & Dravida Parties in Tamil Nadu. And many sub-versions of this story are doing the rounds in society,  just to generate and fuel animosity between groups.

Travancore was a place where cotton was not cultivated, and from ancient times people were sparing in the use of cloth. What little cloth produced was of best quality compared to the English Mill cloth, and therefore expensive. And all could not afford purchase of cloth other than for  basic necessity. Those who  used the ‘randam-mundu’  were men of respectability  in society. Removing one’s own ‘randam-mundu’ is a way of showing respect. This fact had been conveniently overlooked while speaking about ‘Upper-caste Oppression” leading to Channar Revolt.

Excerpts from Samuel Mateers books, given below now dispels all doubts . The illustrations are from his books, and pictures are worth
Woman going to The Well
a thousand words.

Quote “The specific  and ostensible subject of dispute, however, was the wearing  of certain articles of dress by the Christian  women. To maintain the laws of caste, it had been found necessary to enforce  several arbitrary and indecent restrictions respecting dress, as well as distance and deportment ; other-wise, a person of low caste, dressing and wearing ornaments like those of the high castes, might approach them nearer than was permitted, or even pass, in the courts, markets, and other places of public resort, as of the higher castes. It had therefore always been forbidden to Shanars, and others of inferior caste, to cover the bosom  or to wear any clothing whatever above the waist.

But the truer and better instincts of humanity had been aroused by Christianity, and the Christian females were accustomed and taught to wear a kind of plain loose jacket with short sleeves, devised by one of the missionary ladies. This of itself was displeasing to the Sudra aristocracy. And in addition to the jacket (which is not worn by the Sudra females) some of the Christian women, without the consent of the missionaries, and even in several instances in opposition to their advice, had taken the liberty of wearing an additional cloth or scarf laid over the shoulder, called the “upper cloth,” as worn by the Sudra women, and this the latter interpreted as an infringement  of their peculiar and exclusive privilege.

On the whole, then, it was determined that by some means, or by any means, a stop must be put to the progress of Christianity and to the spread of the reforms and innovations already in progress and impending.

WOMEN GRINDING GRAIN
The persecution commenced about the middle of 1827, and continued till 1830. The storm rages chiefly in the Western  division of the mission, although a part of its fury extended to the Eastern division. The opposition  to the truth  commenced in threatening  language, and afterwards proceeded to overt acts of personal assault, annoyance, and public outrage.  Threats were uttered that the missionaries would be assassinated, and their  chapels,  schoolrooms, and houses set on fire;  the erection of the Neyoor mission-house, then in process of building, was forcibly hindered. It became  necessary to guard the mission buildings night after night. Several chapels and school-houses were actually burnt down to the ground by incendiaries, and the erection of new ones prevented by the threats and violence of the Sudras. A native gentleman of high caste, Raman Tambi, who had proved himself friendly  to the missionaries, and had ventured to sell them the ground on which they were erecting the mission-house at Neyoor, was seized and imprisoned on false charges, and was not released for seven years. The native converts were falsely accused, thrown into prison, and sometimes moved from place to place for months, so as to conceal the place of their confinement.  Heathen Shanars and Pariahs were sent, under the guise of inquirers, to act as spies and carry their report to the persecuting party. Some of the schools were interrupted, and the books torn and cast into the street. Menaces were used to deter the native Christians from attending public worship; men were seized on the Sabbath, and compelled to work on that day; women were insulted and beaten in the bazaars; and alarm and terror spread amongst the timid people  in every direction.

Among the Christians seized at one place were the school-master and the principal man of the village, who had recently embraced Christianity; the house of the schoolmaster they first plundered and then burnt. The house of another respectable native, whom, with others, they had falsely charged with murder, they broke open, robbed, and, he himself being absent, seized his three sons. At length  their outrages became so alarming and intolerable as to render it absolutely  necessary  to apply for military aid, which was at once afforded, and was the means of checking for the time the further violence of the assailants.

SYRIAN CHRISTIANS
One poor man was tied to the hind leg  of an elephant, and ill-treated for refusing to do forced labour without pay. Mr.Ashton had to accompany several women, who had been shamefully beaten, and whose clothing had been publicly torn off, to the Dewan, Venkata Row, who had been sent to investigate into these disturbances. They went, wrote Mr.Ashton , to a large building in the fort at Palpanabhapuram, where the Dewan held his court. The Sudra Sepoys  would not allow the women to pass the gateway covered, so they had to remove their , cloths and re-clothe themselves after entering.  They found the Dewan surrounded by a large guard in full uniform, together with the Government officials (all of high caste) and the head men of the Sudra villages, all filled with rage at the unfortunate Christians, and awaiting their arrival. The tumult was great, but the missionary was kindly  received  by the Dewan, who recommended the Christian women to place their clothes across the bosom instead of over the shoulders. After a few inquiries, he advised all to live at peace together and maintain the ancient customs without change, promising that a proclamation with regard to the use of the upper cloth should soon be issued.

LACE WORKER WITH PILLOW
This proclamation appeared on 29th February, 1829, but afforded no relief to the Christians, nor any extension  of liberty  as to the use of decent and convenient clothing.  In it the Christians were blamed for desiring to wear the upper cloth “contrary to orders and ancient customs”, and were charged with refusing to perform the Govt. service. The use of the upper cloth was absolutely  prohibited, the jacket  only being allowed.  Exemption  from Sunday labour and from employment in idolatrous  service was granted. An appeal was made to the precepts of Christianity, as “inculcating humility and obedience to superiors;” totally ignoring the fact that the whole genius of the Christian religion leads to advancement in civilization and decency, and destroys the possibility of slavery and tyranny. The regulation as to obtaining the permission of Government for the erection of chapels, & c., was repeated, and strong hints given against the interference of the missionaries, who had sought to aid their people by constitutional means in bringing their grievances before the notice of the Govt.  Promises were made of redress in the courts of justice; but these were presided over at that time, almost without exception, by corrupt and partial Brahmans and Sudras, so that the poor had no access to them on just or equal terms. (pages 277-281, Chapter XX. Establishment  and Early History of the London Mission in Travancore, From the book “The Land of Charity: A Descriptive Account of Travancore and its People, with special reference to Missionary Labour, By the Rev. Samuel Mateer F.L.S of the London Missionary Society, First Published :London, 1870)

DEFINITION OF 'UPPER-CLOTH' AS GIVEN BY  THE MISSIONARY 

 
SUDRA LADY
“As already stated, low caste females in Travancore were forbidden to wear any clothing whatever above the waist. This restriction has recently been removed by law, but a lengthened period must elapse before the poorer classes, excepting those who enjoy the protection and support of the Christian community, dare to avail themselves largely of this privilege, on account of the jealousy of the higher castes. Nor, indeed, do all the low castes, as individuals, care greatly for the use of the privilege, except on special occasions, as it involves some trifling additional expense and trouble. However, it is now left by the native Government, as it ought to be, to the free choice and right feeling of the parties, themselves. On his first arrival in the country a European must be greatly shocked by seeing so large a proportion of the people going about in a state thus nearly approaching to nudity, and it requires a long time to become familiar with such a state of things. The dark complexion of the natives, perhaps, makes this custom seem less unnatural than it would be amongst Europeans. Christian  and Mohammedan women wear a neat jacket of white or coloured cotton.

The Sudra and other middle-class females place a light cotton cloth 
Vijaykant in a movie weaing 'Randam-Mundu'
loosely across the breast and over one shoulder. This is called the “upper cloth”. But in the presence of the Royal Family or persons of high rank, or when saluting such persons passing by, ancient usage actually required  the removal of this cloth.
  Since 1865, however, by the good feeling and enlightened action of the maharajah and his Minister, this degrading custom was discountenanced and completely  abolished by a Proclamation of which the following is a translation :-

“Whereas  Sudra women, when in the presence of persons in high office, and when serving in the Temple or Palace,  lower their upper
RANEE  & CHILDREN
garment as a mark of respect
, this appears to His Highness (the sacred mind) exceedingly immodest. We have informed the aforesaid persons that this offensive custom is henceforth unnecessary. It is our will that all the native people wear garments in accordance with propriety, and this we now make known, when women in temples, in the Palace, and other places, shall cover the upper parts with the cloth, in accordance with this circular, we hereby order that the officials do not oppose their doing so.”

The Brahman women are, as might be expected, much superior to others in regard to the properties of dress. While imposing barbarous and often inhuman restrictions upon others, the Brahmans have taken good care that they themselves shall not suffer any diminution of comfort or honour.  The upper part of the dress of a Brahman lady consists of a smart coloured jacket, fastening in front, and covering the bosom,  and over this in addition the upper cloth is also worn. The principal garment of all classes of females is a piece of cloth several yards in length,(saree ?) usually of white calico-sometimes coloured or checked-occasionally of silken materials. This is tightly wound around the waist and turned in at one end in a  variety of forms, with neat folds, making a kind of petticoat. The other extremity is used as an “upper cloth,” or shawl, by being thrown  over the shoulder so as to cover the shoulders and bosom. Considerable ingenuity and taste are displayed in the mode of enveloping the person in this cloth, and the whole forms a very graceful and appropriate female dress.” ( ibid. Pages 61, 62)

About male clothing which is sparse :-

Namburi Brahmins
“The mark of Brahmanical dignity is a cord composed of three treble threads of cotton, worn across the breast, running over the left shoulder and under the right arm. This cord, however, or “punul,” is worn  also by goldsmiths and several other castes, and by males of the Royal family. It is renewed from time to time as it wears out. The upper part of the body and the lower part of the legs are usually bare. Over one shoulder, or around the neck, a light scarf-like cloth is often thrown. The principal garment worn by men is the cloth fastened around the waist and covering the lower part of the body and the loins. This is a single piece of cotton cloth, not sewed or pinned, but merely fastened by having the extremity tucked in at one side”

Female dress in Travancore does not vary like the ever changing fashions of European countries. For perhaps two or three thousand years it has remained unaltered.  The Hindu woman has long, black, luxuriant hair, which she ties up in a knot at the back, or, in the case of some castes, at the right side of the head. When fully dressed, rich golden ornaments and a few handsome  flowers are used to decorate the hair. Might it not be worthy  the consideration of fashionable ladies at home whether it would not be a hitherto unthought-of novelty, amidst the  innumerable fashions of “chignons” at present, to try the effect of wearing them, not at the back, or upper part of the head, but at the side, in imitation of this ancient, yet novel, Malabar fashion ? Strange that none of the leaders of fashion in Europe have thought of this ! (pages 57, 58,59)

The ordinary  costume  of the people of Travancore is remarkably
Muhammadans
simple and primitive.
While hard at work, many men, such as fishers, tree climbers, and others, wear but the scantiest shred of clothing demanded by common decency. A miserable covering of green leaves serves to hide the nakedness of some of the wildest of the mountaineers.  Even the better classes ordinarily wear very light clothing. “This , you know, is our uniform,” said a noble of high rank whom I visited once, and who received me dressed in a single  piece of cotton cloth fastened round the loins. A  Tamil man from the East is recognized in Travancore by the comparative abundance of cloths in which he is enveloped. On important occasions and in public, wealthy natives don a long coat or jacket of white or printed calico, with trousers somewhat in the European style. This is the usual dress of the Mohammedans and Christian teachers, and of the native police and Government messengers , or “peons”. The latter wear also an embroidered belt with a brass or silver badge, having inscribed on it the department of state in which they are employed. The materials ordinarily used are common calico, or checked and striped coloured cloths, manufactured in the country. The better classes occasionally use fine silks, dyed or printed with brilliant colours.

Village Panchayat shown in a movie  with the main character wearing "Randam-Mundu"
A turban of white or coloured muslin, tightly and neatly folded in a great variety of fashions, is the usual head-dress of the Travancorean. This is very often, simplified into a plain piece of white cloth, which may either be thrown over the shoulders or twisted round the head. The turban forms an admirable protection for the head from the burning heat of the sun.  another head-dress is a light cap of cloth fitting closely to the head, but somewhat conical at the top, and coming down low over the ears and back of the head. Slaves and other poor people wear rude caps, composed of the thick, leather-like leaf-sheath of the areca palm tree. ( ibid. page 55)

With regard to his personal comfort and deportment, the only dress of the degraded Pulayan is a piece of coarse cloth fastened round the loins, and a small piece tied around the head as a head-dress. To women, as well as to men, it was forbidden, until 1865 (when , through the benevolent interposition of the British Government, the restriction was removed) to wear any clothing whatever above the waist. Their ornaments  must  not be no more valuable than brass or beads, umbrellas must not be used to shelter the body from the scorching heat of the sun, nor shoes to protect the feet from the thorns and sharp stones of the jungle paths. (page 45)
Pulayars

To mark their degradation, their women  were forbidden  to wear any clothing whatever above the waist. (ibid. P.41)


“Men are (Sudra/Nair men) are not accustomed to cover the body above the waist; so also females when in the house, but when  going out they cover the bosom with a piece of light white cloth, which is sometimes a costly  article, having a border of gold thread.” Page 112, Chapter XII,  Malayalam Sudras,  Book : Native Life in Travancore, By The Rev. Samuel Mateer, F.L.S, Of the London Missionary Society, First Published : London , 1883)

For an exact account of the 'Disturbance' read also 

(1) http://msradha.blogspot.in/2014/05/breast-cloth-controversy-three.html 

A modern narrative of the "Breast-cloth" event, indoctrination of Kerala Dalits to hate the Nairs and other upper-castes.








Saturday, May 3, 2014

'BREAST-CLOTH' CONTROVERSY - THREE DIFFERENT HISTORICAL SOURCES REVEALING THE 'TRUTH' !!!!

I am pleased to bring for the perusal of those interested to know the truth, the Historical material culled from three different sources. All these sources are available in the public domain.

(1)Part 1 is from the The Travancore State Manual  compiled by V.Nagam Aiya, The Dewan of Travancore.  Nagam Aiya  gives us a glimpse of the Origins as well as the Settling down of  Shanars/Nadars in Travancore. The Shanars were invited to settle in Travancore  by the Royal family.Note the attempts of Bishop Robert Caldwell in projecting Nadars as ‘outsiders’ from Ceylon.

(2) Part 2 is  the work of Rev. Samel Mateer. His observations about Travancore  contradict Missionary accounts  of Upper-caste Hindus not allowing females of lower castes from covering their breasts. Since cotton was not cultivated in Travancore, the people there were sparing in the use of textiles. Note the Missionary’s business calculations, in importing inferior textiles from England, capturing  the Travancore market and selling there at huge profits.

(3) Part 3 provides a  detailed account of the disturbances  engineered by the Missionaries, using the pretext of ‘breast cloth’. The dynamics of the strife is neatly brought out by the Deputy Peshcar Shungoony Menon. (Imagine  what would happen if the peon in an  office pulls up a chair in the Sr.Manager's cabin, sit on it, and try to tell him(Mgr.)  that he does not know the theory and practice of his work /job) – This quarrel is not about clothing/non-clothing, but imitation of costumes of the upper-castes. (In India you are not supposed to keep red beacon light on your cars !!! Then there are social restrictions even in this modern world, you are not supposed to breach as a mark of respect to others and their customs)

The  Deputy Peshcar also comments about the work of other Christian Missions in Central Travancore, without creating any Law & Order Problem .

HISTORICAL MATERIAL :-

I.                    Shanars –ORIGIN  AND DESIGNATION.
The Shanars  are a class of Hindus inhabiting  Tinnevelly and the southern taluqs of Travancore. They belong to one of the races that are commonly classed as Dravidians., Tamil being their mother tongue.  The correct  form of the name of this race is Shandrar which is derived from a Tamil word sal. The expressions  Shanrar and Shandrarar are also derived from the same root and are but different forms of Shandrar.

From a few stray hints that are found in the Tamil literature and the traditions peculiar to the race, we learn that the Shanars belong to a wave of warlike adventurers  who migrated towards the south from North India. (The Shanars are called Kali Puthirar (the sons of Kali or Bhadrakali) and this goddess is considered  as their tutelary deity.  – Enathi-Natha-nayanar one of the sixty-three disciples of Siva is described as having belonged  to the Shandrar caste in the  Tamil work Periyapuranam  and as Sakshikula bhava in the Sanskrit work.) Popular legends tend to point out the tract between the Krishna and the Godavari rivers as one of their  earliest homes in India.  But Bishop Caldwell  considers them  as emigrants  from the northern coast of Ceylon  Hence the question as to whence they came has to be solved in common with the other Dravidian races.

 They appear to have, in the earliest times, settled down as rulers  in several parts of the country.  The fact of their having been a ruling race at one time is borne out not only by such expressions as Nadar and Nadalvar. (The expression Nadalvar occurs in some ancient stone inscriptions  of Travancore), but also by numerous customs which are peculiar to them  and by other circumstances. Their rule  was subsequently  overthrown by later waves of Dravidians.

The Shanars of Travancore seem to have migrated into the southern taluqs of Travancore either from or through the Tinnevelly Dist. The traditions  of some of the old families show that their ancestors  had been called into the country by some of the ancient kings of Travancore.  There are eight families to this day known as Ettuveetu-Nadakkal. Of all the taluqs  in Travancore, Eraniel  has the largest number of Shanars. Out of a total of 1,55,864 Shanars in Travancore, 43,044 are found in the Eraniel Taluq, the earliest seat of the Travancore sovereigns, while the Taluqs  of agastisvaram and Tovala, which lie nearer to Tinnevelly than Eraniel, have only 23,718 and 3,263 respectively.  This fact lends countenance to an inference that they were patronized by the ancient kings of Travancore. They have permanently settled down in  the country. The bulk of the Shanars of Travancore are found in Eraniel, Vilavankod, Agastisvaram, kalkulam and Neyyatinkara. They are more numerous than any other caste in these Taluqs except in the last.

The people of this caste are ordinarily  called Shanars by people of other castes, but they themselves  use the term  Nadar. The word Nadar is also used as a title. The titles Tiruppapur Nadar, Udaya Martanda Nadar, Nagamani  Martanda Nadar,  & C.  were granted to some families of Shanars by the ancient kings of Travancore.  It has to be said in this connection that the Ezhavars (Izhavas)  are sometimes spoken   of as Shanars because some families of that class are called by that name. This is however a mistake. Perhaps some families of Izhavas  were in ancient  times  granted the tiltle of shanars. Izhavas, like oil-mongers, Alavars and others, belong  to the left-hand classes, while shanars occupy a high place among the right-hand classes. The Shanars are known as Valankai-Uyarvu-Kondar  or   Valankai-Uya-Kondar. These terms are found in ancient and modern title-deeds.

The  names used for the headmen of the caste are Periya Nadan, Turattu Nadan, Mutal Pattu Nadan, Karakara Nadan,  & c. The  head-man of the working men is called Mukkandan. (pages 392, 393, Vol. 2, The Travancore State Manual, written by V.Nagam Aiya,First Published 1906, Publisher : Asian Educational Services)

Other information  like  (a) Appearance, dress and ornament (b) Sub-divisions, (c) Marriage (d) Inheritance (e) Religion (f)  Customs and Ceremonies (g) Funeral Ceremonies (h) Occupation (i) Language and Education (j) Condition and Status (k) Food and drink  (l) Distribution across Travancore, are provided , some of them in detail.

In Vol. I of  The Travancore State Manual,from pages 525 to 531, in Section C-Modern History, a portion titled “ Shanar Converts and Hindus –Disturbances in South Travancore” is provided . But since this book was published only by 1906, the account from another book published earlier , ie in 1878 is provided in the coming pages. 

II.                  Cotton manufacture – Chapter XXII

Cotton not being grown in Travancore, and the people having hitherto  been accustomed, even till recently, many of them by law obliged, to go half naked, and to wear only coarse qualities of cloth, the manufacture of this material is carried on to a very limited extent. Most of the calico used for clothing  purposes is imported from other parts, and a Tinnevelly man  may often be recognized  in Travancore by his fuller clothing.   The climate  does not appear to suit the growth of the cotton plant, though attempts were made, some twenty years ago, by the distribution of seeds, to introduce the better kinds of Peruvian, Persian, Bourbon, and other varieties. The raw material required for hand-spinning, and other purposes, is imported from British India. The statistics of forty years ago give the imports of raw cotton as 305 candies, or about 200,000 lbs, yielding  duty 3,020 rupees;  and those of last year state the tariff value as 26,675 rupees, admitted free of duty.

The last part of this chapter   “In addition to the local manufacture, long-cloth, chiefly grey, coloured  handkerchiefs,  and other piece goods, have always  been imported as needed to meet the demands of the population, from the neighbouring  provinces  and from Ceylon. These goods ae now admitted duty free, except those brought direct from England to Ceylon. The tariff value of imports of piece goods in (year) M.E 1054 was 1,117,498 rupees, and M.E 1055, Rs.846,632.  Take a large average of 10 lacs for piece  goods and 2 lacs for yarn imported, and double it for retail cost, say 24 lacs of  rupees  would be the total sum spent by the 24 lacs of inhabitants  in the country, or only one rupee per head per annum for clothing, not very much beyond what is spent upon tobacco !. Here is vast room for improvement.

English long-cloth is little used by the poor native population, and the low quality sometimes imported is complained of as giving less wear than country-made cotton.  They say that four or five common English steam-loom cloths will wear out for one native hand-made cloth; and that the former, when worn out, are useless even for wicks, so much required for oil lamps, burning away too rapidly.

Cotton cloth purchased by retail in a market in Travancore seems, as far as we can judge, to cost fully a fourth more than the retail price in England.” – (pages 239, 241, 242,  NATIVE LIFE IN TRAVANCORE  by  The Rev. Samuel Mateer, F.L.S of the London Missionary Society,and Author of “The Land of Charity,”  First Published : London ,1883,  Publisher : Asian Educational Services )

III. Deputy Peishcar Shungoonny Menon's account of the Disturbance.

  “Soon after the Governor’s departure, the deputy Peishcar Shungoonny Menon  rejoined his division in the south, but he had the mortification to find, that, during his absence fresh misunderstanding had arisen  between the Hindus and the Shanar converts.  The spirit of hostility  between these two sections of the inhabitants had lain dormant for some time chiefly  through the interference  of the Sircar authorities, but it seemed to have been again roused up, and the disputes  this time were of a more serious nature.  The Peishcar’s efforts to throw oil on the troubled waters and bring matters to a satisfactory  conclusion proved in the long run abortive; although he succeeded in restoring harmony between the parties temporarily.

The misunderstanding  had originated entirely from the Shanar Christian females assuming the costume of high caste Hindu females.  They had been doing this from the early days of their conversion, and instead of endeavouring to suppress what might eventually cause serious complications, the Missionaries encouraged them and fostered among them a spirit of hostility against the high caste Hindus. The Sircar had been necessitated, in 1814, to interfere and legislate for the future guidance of the Shanars,but notwithstanding this during a period of fifteen years there were quarrels on various occasions between the parties. Matters now looked serious and the interference  of the Govt. seemed to be again called for.  There had been a legislative enactment in 1829, at the very commencement of the reign of the greatly renowned Maha Rajah who died in 1022 M.E (1847 AD). In this enactment, it was clearly laid down that the female Shanar converts were at liberty to cover their bosoms with a jacket, and a strict prohibition was laid down against their adopting high caste Hindu costumes;  but the aim of the converts  had been persistently to defy the higher class Hindus and to despise their brother Shanars, who professed Hinduism (certainly with a hidden motive), and the converts were supported all along by the Missionaries whose intention apparently was to introduce  English customs as if they were in civilized England instead of Travancore.  They also claimed perfect toleration and liberty for their converts, without taking into consideration the time, the country, the nature of the Government, and their own position in foreign land and the consequence was that it was difficult to settle the dispute at once, while on the part of the Shanars there was an open defiance of the laws of the land, which, on account of the encouragement they received from the Missionaries, it was difficult to curb. And the Travancore Government, being reluctant to come in contact with the Missionaries, owing to its regard for the paramount power, desisted from taking active measures, and the result was that the Hindus and the Shanar converts and their respective supporters openly assumed hostile positions against each other.

Such a feeling existed between the parties from the earliest period of the Mission works in south Travancore, but by the strong protection and toleration afforded to the promotion of the Christian Missions by the Travancore Govt., the work of the Missionaries progressed most rapidly, and in the course of the next thirty years conversions to Christianity increased, and in the villages in Nanjenaud and the adjacent districts numerous Chapels, Churches and Schools were built.  These places were crowded with large numbers of Shanar converts, and the Catechists commenced to itenerate through all Hindu villages with their tracts and books and began preaching to the Hindus. This circumstance must naturally have roused the jealousy of the Hindus, while the converts instead of keeping themselves within bounds, took advantage  of their support by the Missionaries and began to prove themselves a source of annoyance to the Hindu portion of the people, by openly defying them whenever there was an opportunity and the result was the complication above alluded to.

It is a matter worthy of particular remark, that the Mission work of conversion in south Travancore was mostly, if not exclusively, confined to the Shanars, Parayars, and other low caste people, who form but a minor portion of the population of the districts, while conversions among the higher orders were seldom effected. At the same time, while the Church Mission Society in the north did its work quietly  and without endeavoring to introduce  reforms violently, the London Mission in the south seemed to pursue quite a different policy for nearly half a century.

The system adopted by the London Mission savored more of the undue and illegitimate exercise of power than persuasion and  well meant endeavours to impress upon people the truth of the principles of religion, and hence, the chief cause for the Hindus to be dissatisfied with them and to consider their proceedings offensive.

This fact can be seen from a fact connected with the founder of the London Mission in Travancore, the Reverend Mr. Ringeltaube, who, on paying a visit to the then Dewan Velu Thamby, for the express purpose of endeavouring to obtain a footing for the London Mission in Travancore, in 1806, being asked by the minister what religion  he professed, the Reverend gentleman answered “Colonel macaulay’s Religion,”(See Reverend Mateer’s Land of Charity, page 262) instead of saying the Christian religion or the religion established by Christ, who He was, when and how Jesus Christ was born, what wonders and miracles Christ had performed in the world, how He became the Saviour of mankind, how He suffered, and how His resurrection  took place after His crucifixion and burial and so on.  Let the reader note the severe rebuke implied  in the following remark which that great Hindu Statesman made on hearing what Mr. Ringeltaube  said about his professing “Colonel Macaulay’s religion,” “I never knew that there was such a religion”  said the dewan, meaning of course, a religion invented or professed by a private individual, for Christianity was in existence in Travancore for more than a thousand years before that period.

Acting under such selfish principles, it is no wonder that the Missionaries considered themselves to be entitled to respect from the Hindus. Why the Society did not think  of proceeding  in a more conciliatory manner with the Hindu portion of the population, and why they endeavoured to create in the Hindus a spirit antagonistic to the Christian religion are points for inquiry.

The very illustration in Mr. Mateer’s work, page 277, will show plainly how the females of the Shanar converts were taught to imitate the costume of the higher class Hindus, while there are numerous modes  of costumes adapted for Christians which would be more desirable from a European point of view. It is clear that this style of costume adopted by the Shanar converts was with the express object of annoying  the Hindu section of the population of the districts.

The costume in question was not the only cause for offence which the Shanar converts gave to the higher classes, but in various other ways they rendered themselves obnoxious to the Sudra community.
For instance, one Shanar Puthathan Cutty and his  wife, Eshakee, were the cultivators of madom Pillay, a Sudra landed proprietor. These became converts and left Madom Pillay’s service, and Puthathan Cutty subsequently became a Catechist under a Missionary, and his wife assumed a costume similar to that of Madom Pillay’s wife. Now, both the Catechist and his wife came to Madom Pillay’s house and began to converse with him, on terms of equality, commencing a discussion with Madom Pillay on the subject of religion and calling him “an ignorant man” and a sinner (as all the heathens are put down by the Mission people in the vernacular, in the category of  “Agjanikal”- ignorant men). Was it possible for Madom Pillay not to resent the impertinence of those who were but lately his dependents; and their sole object in coming to his house- the wife dressed in a costume similar to that of madom Pillay’s wife – must have been to cause him annoyance ? It is also worthy of note that on a quarrel ensuing between the Shanar converts  and Madom Pillay, the Missionary who used to support him , espoused the cause of the Catechist and appeared  himself before the authorities and adopted measures for the punishment of Madom Pillay in which favoured by the advantages of his color and position  he succeeded. Here is a solution  of the question why the Missionaries are considered by the Hindus as acting partially towards the converts and prosecuting the Hindus. Besides if even a reasonable complaint were made by sircar official, he would be represented by the Missionaries as partial and in a communication to the resident denounced as corrupt, unprincipled, and so forth. 

The Missionaries at the  same time did not hesitate to drag the Govt.  into the discussion.  The Missionaries by their writings can make the world believe that terrible persecutions against Christianity are carried on in Travancore, and the British Govt.  invariably  gives credence to statements thus disseminated, and being the paramount power, they can come down upon the Travancore Sircar with rebuke and strong disapproval, ignoring the fact that Christianity as professed by the Syrians and Roman Catholics existed in Travancore from time immemorial.  A convincing  instance in support of this statement shall be given presently.

Though the matters connected with the upper cloth dispute between the Shanar converts and the Hindu  were temporarily  adjusted by the exertions of the  deputy Peishcar, yet the disputes broke out again in a short time and several quarrels and disturbances took place between the parties in the markets and throughfares where the females of Shanar converts appeared in Hindu costumes. Just at this time, the Dewan Madhava Row paid a visit to the south and finding the serious nature of the rupture between the parties, he issued a proclamation on the 27th Dec 1868, as a precautionary measure and with  the view of preventing further disturbances. The tenor of the proclamation was that, it was clearly wrong to violate ancient usages; that the law laid down for the observance of the parties  concerned, by the royal proclamation in the year 1829, should be respected; that whoever infringed the law would be liable to severe punishment, that Shanars were to bear the same in mind and act accordingly; that Sudras and people of the higher caste were not to do anything themselves against the Shanars and cause a breach of the peace, and that should they commit anything contrary to the law, due notice would be taken of their conduct.

This proclamation had nothing new in it. It was entirely founded upon  the enactment passed under the judicious advice and counsel of Colonel Munro in 1814, and in 1829, with the full concurrence of the able Resident, Colonel Morrison, C.B.

The rules prescribed by the Circular Order of 1814, and the proclamation of 1829, were precisely the same, and were calculated to prevent collisions and preserve peace between the contending parties. The sum and substance of those rules were that Shanar females, converted to Christianity should wear the costume worn by other Christian females, ie., jackets similar to those used by the lace-making Shanar females, as represented in the “Land of Charity,” page 272, but no prohibition whatever had been issued against the convert females  covering their bodies. Those rules were observed  and matters went on smoothly  for about thirty years. The Missionaries, for the time being, were contented with these rules, and preferred to wait for an opportunity to get them amended in a manner favouring the aims and fancies of the Shanar and Parayar converts.

Under these circumstances, Dewan Madhava Row’s judicious proclamation was considered by the Missionaries as a proof of his “gross and unconcealed partiality,” and they therefore at first petitioned the Maha Rajah  and then the Madras Govt. praying for the cancelling of the Dewan’s proclamation, the Circular Order of May 1814, and the proclamation of Feb.1829.

By this time, Lord Harris, the Governor of Madras retired, and was succeeded by Sir Charles Trevelyan, before whom the question was laid for decision.  His Excellency seemed to have taken a one-sided view of the question, and without giving  the matter calm and deliberate consideration, and reflecting on the real meaning of the Circular Order and proclamation alluded to, came to the conclusion that the privilege of covering their bosoms had been denied to the females of the Shanar converts by the Travancore Govt., and under this impression wrote in the following decisive terms to General Cullen :- “I have seldom met with a case in which not only truth and justice, but every feeling of our common humanity are so entirely on one side. The whole civilized world would cry shame upon us if we did not make a firm stand on such an occasion. If anything could make this line of conduct more incumbent on us, it would be the extraordinary fact that persecution of a singularly personal and delicate kind is attempted to be justified by a royal proclamation, the special object of which was to assure to her Majesty’s Indian subjects, liberty of thought and action so long as they did not interfere with the just right of others. I should fail in respect to her Majesty, if I attempted to describe the feelings with which she must regard the use made against her own sex of the promises of protection so graciously accorded by her.

It will be your duty to impress these views on His Highness the Rajah, and to point out to him that such prohibition as those conveyed in the Circular Order of May 1814, or in the proclamation of the 3rd of February 1829, are unsuited to the present age, and unworthy of an enlightened Prince.”

This communication from the new Governor startled the old General, and he pressed upon the Maha Rajah to pass an act in accordance with the views of His Excellency but by adopting such a sweeping measure, The Maha Rajah apprehended still greater evils, and, consequently, after due and long deliberation and consultation with the able Dewan, a new royal proclamation was prepared and published in July of the same year 1859, making further concessions to the Shanar females in the matter of their dress. But this concession did not imply any permission to the convert females to assume the costume of Brahman women. The Missionaries were not quite satisfied with this proclamation, but it sufficed to check further disturbances on the score of dress.

The spirit of the Missionaries in this matter is evident from the Rev.S.Mateer’s work entitled “Land of Charity:” Chapter XII, pages 295-306. In his quasi-sensational writings, The Reverend gentleman animadverts rather strongly, and it must be said, with a good of unfairness, on the proceedings of a Govt. which had tolerated Christianity  hundreds of years before Protestantism  came into existence and which  had protected the very London Mission itself  from its cradle, so to speak, and this in a country whose people and sovereign profess orthodox Hinduism.

The unfair animadversions of the Missionaries cast a reflection on the reputation of the Maha rajah and of his Govt. and created an unfriendly feeling between them and the Hindus, who charge them with want of gratitude, after they had been allowed to work freely and open Missions  in their land.” (pages 503-511, Chapter VIII, History of Travancore From The Earliest Times, by P. Shungoonny Menon., First Published : 1878, Current Publisher : Asian Educational Services)


Sowing the seeds of Hatred in Dalit Minds !!!! - A First Hand Account

My intimate experience with Dalits are limited. But from  the age of  about 12 years to around 18 years, I had seen my father in his middle forties interacting with Dalit Christians (from the Pulaya community) frequently, necessitated by agriculture. I am sure this has continued from his father’s time (my grand-father), and before I had been born, one Dalit Christian family from my grandfather’s time  had been tenants on our land. I had heard  it from my father’s side that they had a hut in the corner of the land. But  a law favouring the landless tenants paved the way (forced ?) to buy a plot of land (5 cents) for this family, and they were thus relocated  to  their own land and tiled roof house  less than a kilometer away.

After partitioning  of land between siblings, my father got an acre(100 cents) of paddy field, and this land was within the municipal limits. All the landholders around were only having the same extent of land and those having more than  five acres were non-existent. And each holder had close contact with  one Dalit Christian family , with that family head as ‘Kaval-karan” (care-taker)of the agricultural land. After  sowing, during re-planting of the shoots , during harvesting  or any occasion when more hands are needed he used to organize  members from the Dalit families around him. Otherwise he and his family handled all the agricultural works almost six to eight months in a year and  daily wages were paid , in addition to food.(two times with black coffee in between). During the lean months when work was not  needed consecutively for more than seven to ten days, for his needs I had seen him approaching my father, and without any reluctance my father shared what was possible. Looking back and thinking about the interactions, I am aware that a organic relationship existed between them, though the surrounding environment had started vitiating with Marxisim and trade-unionism.  I also think that the land-lord and tenant were each in his own world, and the interactions between them necessitated by the needs of both were peaceful and cordial. There was an invisible bonding between them.

I used to go to the field during the time of re-planting and sowing, and there is one Dalit woman in my vivid child-hood memories. She was in her middle thirties at that time, married and with three children and my memories connected with her is due to her singing during the time of field labour. Her name is Thanka.

When I joined  for Pre-Degree (around 16 yrs) , all farming activities ceased. Buying rice and milk became cheaper and convenient than the efforts and money spent for paddy cultivation and cattle rearing. Within a few years, our contact with the Kaval-karan of our land, which used to be regular and almost on a daily basis became few and widely spaced. Thereafter we used to see them very rarely, mostly on festival occasions like Christmas, Onam or Vishu. Nowadays all contact is lost  between the new generations.

The  agricultural labourers, mostly belonging to the Dalit community took to other vocations, mostly modern. Thanka, the dalit woman I had mentioned earlier, took to selling fish. Thus she used to visit our house hold occassionally. Needless to say, the warmth in regards/relationship of these familiar people, (shall I say old-guard) was palpable.

After 18 years, I had never been in my native place constantly for more than six months. Thereafter I got employed and finally had settled in Chennai. During this time my father expired, and mother was with me and my visits to native place became few and far.

Between 2009-2011,  I used to visit my hometown often. My fathers’s younger brother stays adjacent to the  family property I inherited. During one  visit, he informed  that Thanka, now in her middle sixties wished to see me and had enquired with him.

Thus she came to see me. She climbed the steps of the verandah and sat on the half-wall, and motioned to  me to take the chair opposite to her. During my father’s  time, they used to stand in the courtyard outside the half-wall. She addressed me in my pet name, which she had used when I was a boy. She said she had come to ask donation for  the church building. The  church building, used by the small Dalit congregation, she informed me was in a dilapidated condition. I donated her money, for which she gave me a printed receipt.

Thereafter  our conversation  drifted to old reminiscences, which were pleasant for us both. But when the conversation drifted to the present, I could sense rancour in her words. Cultivation in large swathes of  paddy fields within  and around the  municipal limit terminated and were lying fallow from 1980-82 onwards.  Most of the Dalit families who were traditionally dependent on these lands, as agricultural labourers were forced to go in search of other work.  By this time the extensive use of fertilizers and pesticides used in these fields, had made many of them diseased. Alchoholism  became rampant. There was thus total disruption in their way of life & work.

When it came to the talk of   the new church building, her anger burst out. Dalit Christians she said were never treated  on par by other Christian denominations. Social intercourse like marriage or even interdining  or atleast  common worship  (within the same church building/congregation) were TOTALLY absent with other Christian sects.  She felt that this whole society from historical time  continues to exploit them and have let them down.

What she explained to  me next surprised and shocked me.!!! She informed me that she knew History and asked me whether I knew the etymological origin and meaning of the word ‘Pulaya’ (male) & “Pulakalli” (female). Pulaya is the name of the Dalit community to which she belongs.

She told me that the word Pulakkalli is comprises of two parts. The first  part according to her is the word  Pular, that means early morning. The second part is the word ‘kani’, meaning the first object or person that you see, as soon as you wake up in the morning. If one is seeing an auspicious object or person, the day will pass-off  favourably. Malayalees used to keep ‘Vishu-kani’, on the first day of the Malayalam New-Year.

After providing the etymological roots of the word ‘Pulakkalli’, she proceeded to draw up the connections. She told that in the pre-modern past, the Pulayas used to live in a corner of the land owned by the ‘janmi’ (land-lord) , and it is their (Pulaya women) first duty in the morning to clean the front-courtyard of dry leaves and other materials that  makes it untidy. In those days in Travancore, women especially those belonging to disadvantaged castes never used to cover their breasts.  So these Pulaya woman/women are required to bare their bare breasts standing upright, facing the front-door of the  house, on the crack of daylight , the instant when they hear it being opened. The land-lord had imposed on them this duty DAILY, so that when he opens the front door and peers out, he is able to see the most auspicious sight of the bare breasts of these Dalit women. She narrated this story with undertones of  lascivious behavior and sexual exploitation by landlords and Dalit women being sex-slaves of the Hindu landlords.

Those who would have tutored her to hate this land and its customs  & traditions, would not have anticipated  the questions that I posed to her. Since she was married and had three children it was quite easy to put across the idea to her. I just asked her to recollect her experience of male human sexuality. I just asked her whether her husband in the prime of their life had only  lust and sex in his mind. 24x7 does a man think of only sex !!!!.  Moreover has she ever spared any thought regarding  the land-lords family members. Wouldn’t he be having in his house teenage sons, grown up sons, daughters, daughters-in-law, wife, aged mother, father etc. Will any family man dare to exhibit  such unrighteous conduct, setting a degrading example  before his kith and kin. It should also be kept in mind that matriarchy was prevalent in Kerala, with the matriarch as the head of the house-hold.

She  became speechless, considering what I had told her. I just told her whoever is behind this venomous story being projected as ‘History” is trying their level best to create hatred between the Dalits and other communities. In a very personal way, animosity/hatred  between her children and my children. The intensity of this hatred of her children or succeeding generations  will be very severe because of the element of sexual exploitation and attack on the modesty/chastity of  their mothers. They will try to retaliate in the same coin.

Fortunately  at that time I had an authentic Malayalam Dictionary , ‘Shabda-tharavali’ with me , which I had bought to  take with me to Chennai. Together we looked up the meaning of the word Pulayan & Pulakkalli in it. The word Pulayan means one who works on the land. Pulam has the meaning land, field etc.Pulakalli is the female noun of Pulayan.

She then demanded that the Dictionary costing Rs.800/-  be given to her. She wanted to show it to those who had given her coaching in History. I agreed on condition that it be returned  during my next visit a few months later. I could not elicit any information from her as to her tutors.  I could only speculate about them- Marxists !!??, Ambedkarites !!!???, New Age Evangelists !!??? New Age Christian Faith Groups !!!???Other evil influences stalking our land !!???( I believe that traditional Christians in Kerala will not stoop down to such low levels in the indoctrination of hatred.)  Who is likely to benefit from the alienation of the Dalits !!??

Why did I narrate this experience of mine ? I feel that there are concerted  behavior   from various quarters, some committed unwittingly, some done deliberately to create cleavage between communities. It is desired earnestly by modernity and associated commercial  interests that traditional equilibrium be broken and the society turns violent. A violent society provides huge business opportunities  and huge/quick  profits . As of today’s position  USA will then intervene and put its puppet govt and then bleed the country white. In the process all the goodness of a society will be lost. 

As far as I can recollect , I had never seen my father or his siblings(two are alive) speaking badly about, deprecatingly   or having any sort of animus to the Dalit community, even to this day.(To this day because ,both are not bound together (at present) in the practice of agriculture). Even though, occasionally  there were discontent  on the quantum of work completed, never wages were compromised or any harsh conditions of work (like modern time/motion study)  imposed on the agricultural labourers. Nor were any discrimination practiced , Dalits  vis-à-vis  labourers belonging to other communities. Nor  was there much difference between the material conditions of the land-lords  vis-a-vis labourers. The inequality in wealth was mostly restricted to the ownership of land.

I am puzzled when reading reports about the atrocities and violence between communities and Dalits vis-à-vis non-Dalits.  What could have gone wrong ? Did the moderns who are at the helm of  authority, newspapers and other agencies understand the problem clearly.?  Has modernity infused  the undesirable value of limitless and unrestrained material ambition  across all sections  of  people, which may be the root cause of violence !!??Are  the disturbance & violence  the handi-work of malcontents, which you can find in all sections of the society and at all periods in time !!??


Has the  modern world really contributed  in producing better human beings !!!??? Think about this. Meanwhile let us not talk disdainfully about our  ancestors and the Caste system !!!!!