This is a letter written to our Prof, who had been leading the MBA Dept. in a Reputed Univ. in India during our studies there :
Dear Sir,
I had been thinking about work/management, and the
Indian perspective about the same.
Seems like work was viewed negatively by all cultures. The
people in all cultures were resistant to change. Change represents new
movement/action/work.(Karma also includes thinking). They felt that each small
change to their life-style, is moving farther away from the ideal. The advent
of Christianity and the Industrial revolution changed all that. Now in the
modern age work is given a higher value which it does not actually deserve.
This observation in relation to modern context, is based on empirical
negative evidence, like climate change and wars, the result of human
activity/karma. (The latest eg is the ‘man-made’ Uttarakhand disaster.)
Work is considered virtuous now, which by all accounts is a false value.
The ancient Indians were the ONLY people , who had the
COMPLETE knowledge or who tried to understand work COMPLETELY. This
understanding of work , by our ancestors , could be garnered from the Gita.
Indians knew that work is not having any intrinsic value. As
per our rishis, Work is in the realm of inert matter. And in contrast to
Consciousness or Chaitanya, from which the Universe appears, matter
which is inert cannot give one happiness, which is considered emanating
from that consciousness. (In fact consciousness(bodham) is
happiness).The cause is not fully present in the effect(all matter) because of
Maya. (MAYA is a very important in our explanation of ‘names & forms’
that we see around us) Therefore matter is not having the intrinsic
happiness/bliss of the cause and is only an appearance and is caused by
karma. The aim of Indian civilization was to enable all to realize the
reality behind the appearance and thus be happy/blissful permanently. This
state corresponds to Naishkarmayam = No karma !
Indians also were aware that it is impossible for a embodied
life to remain without action/karma/work/movement. Karma is done by body,
mind and sound.(vak). The embodied life form is forced to do karma. Whereas
karma-lessness (One should not mistake this state as corresponding to
lifelessness/death) is the only state whereas one enjoys unconditional
and constant happiness. Conditional happiness through any material means is temporary/fleeting
and always followed by its opposite.
Thus the search for permanent peace and happiness, ended in
accepting the inevitability of work and performing work to ‘rub-off’ work, the
ultimate aim being worklessness. While doing work, as per one’s innate nature,
a mental stillness is aimed at, without any likes or dislikes in the action.
Though compelled to do work because of the innate nature of oneself, the
motions has to be gone through with detachment. No likes or dislikes, and no
anxiety for the result, at the same time doing the actions in the most sincere
way considering it as worship of the supreme principle. While doing work, one
should consider himself as just an instrument contributing for a greater cause,
and the action performed should be selfish,-only to the extent of
sustaining the instrument. (body). The other greater part of work is for the
whole, considered as God.(Ishwar). One should not do action, motivated by
fruits , that action may bring forth.
Considering the whole picture, work is not having any
intrinsic value in Indian culture. Work/karma and its management for profit, is
not the ‘be-all’, expected to be ‘by-all’, and had never been part of our
national life.
Indian attitude towards work as not having any intrinsic
value, eased the pressure on work performance, which freed the mind of the
artisan and handicraftsmen helping them to bring forth great products in art
and other utilities.(with meager resources like capital, plant and machinery)
.Likewise farmers and husbandmen were able to contribute significantly
feeding the entire population. Work for them was worship, to wear away the
karma-vasanas, conforming with the ultimate aim of life, ie. moksha.
This was quite unlike the modern/Western attitude towards work and profits.
Regds
Radhakrishnan.M.S
From: Parmeshwar Rao [mailto:rao_parmeshwar@yahoo.com]
ReplyDeleteSent: Saturday, June 29, 2013 9:51 AM
To: Radhakrishnan.M.S
Cc: ishwar@yahoo.com; mohanb_1@yahoo.com; amita srivastava
Subject: Re: Work/Karma NOT having value in Indian culture !!??
Dear Mr. Radhakrishnan,
Thanks for your thoughtful write up.
As in the past, I am forwarding to Prof. Ishwar Dayal for his considered feedback on the write up.
Also, I wonder whether this write up can be included and used as a theme for discussion by students of MBA, participants in MDP and others in the forthcoming book, Human Values in Management: Transformation through Experiential Learning - being co authored by Mohan Bangaruswamy, Founder Director, Shangrila Management Consultants, Banagalore ( an alumnus of MKU MBA), Amita Srivastava, Director, BCRTC, Ghaziabad (Prime Facilitator, Spandan), and myself.
Please confirm your concurrence for its inclusion in the book. If you want to improve or revise it, please do so.
Cordially - G.P.Rao.